Splenic Pathologies Related Surgery Thesis Topics

Splenic Pathologies Related Thesis Topics

This collection of splenic pathologies thesis topics for MS General Surgery and DNB General Surgery candidates covers traumatic splenic injuries, splenomegaly and hypersplenism, splenic cysts and abscesses, vascular emergencies, focal lesions and splenectomy-related findings. The proposed splenic trauma research topics for general surgery, splenic vascular disease thesis topics for general surgery and splenic lesion research topics for surgical residents can be adapted to a single thesis period using routinely available emergency records, blood counts, ultrasonography, computed tomography and operative or histopathological findings where indicated. A defensible general surgery protocol or synopsis should specify the patient-selection pathway, reference standard and primary endpoint before data collection.

Last reviewed and updated: October 2026 · 2026–27 admissions

Our MD Transfusion Medicine Thesis Guidance provides structured protocols, blood bank safety standards, and institutional review board (IRB) layout guides.

Splenic Trauma and Traumatic Splenic Injuries

  1. Blunt splenic trauma in adults: clinical, laboratory and computed tomography profile in a descriptive cross-sectional study.
  2. Isolated splenic injury and splenic injury with associated intra-abdominal trauma: differences in clinical and radiological findings in a comparative cross-sectional study.
  3. Computed tomography grade of splenic injury and haemodynamic status at emergency presentation: an analytical cross-sectional study.
  4. Serum haemoglobin level and radiological severity of splenic trauma: a cross-sectional analytical study.
  5. Mechanism of injury and anatomical pattern of splenic trauma in adults: a descriptive cross-sectional study.
  6. Road traffic injury and fall-related splenic trauma: differences in injury grade and associated abdominal injuries in a comparative cross-sectional study.
  7. Perisplenic hematoma on computed tomography and severity of splenic injury: an analytical cross-sectional study.
  8. Hemoperitoneum volume and computed tomography grade of splenic trauma: a cross-sectional correlation study.
  9. Active contrast extravasation in splenic trauma and its relationship with injury grade and haemodynamic parameters: an analytical cross-sectional study.
  10. Splenic laceration depth and volume of hemoperitoneum on computed tomography: a cross-sectional imaging study.
  11. Subcapsular and intraparenchymal splenic hematomas: differences in radiological characteristics in a comparative cross-sectional study.
  12. Hilar and non-hilar splenic injuries: differences in computed tomography morphology and haemodynamic presentation in a comparative cross-sectional study.
  13. Upper pole, lower pole and central splenic injuries: anatomical distribution in blunt abdominal trauma in a descriptive cross-sectional study.
  14. Splenic vascular injury on computed tomography angiography and associated parenchymal injury patterns: a cross-sectional study.
  15. Splenic pseudoaneurysm following blunt trauma detected during index imaging: prevalence and computed tomography characteristics in a cross-sectional study.
  16. Traumatic splenic artery pseudoaneurysm and active contrast extravasation: differences in radiological characteristics in a comparative cross-sectional study.
  17. Splenic infarction following blunt trauma and its relationship with hilar vascular injury: an analytical cross-sectional study.
  18. Devitalized splenic parenchyma on computed tomography and associated injury grade: a cross-sectional study.
  19. Splenic trauma with and without left lower rib fractures: differences in computed tomography injury severity in a comparative cross-sectional study.
  20. Left-sided rib fractures as indicators of splenic injury in blunt chest-abdominal trauma: a diagnostic cross-sectional study.
  21. Abdominal tenderness and guarding in patients with computed tomography-confirmed splenic injury: an analytical cross-sectional study.
  22. Kehr sign in traumatic splenic injury and its relationship with hemoperitoneum: a cross-sectional study.
  23. Ultrasonography and computed tomography in detecting traumatic splenic injury: a comparative diagnostic cross-sectional study.
  24. Focused assessment with sonography for trauma and computed tomography findings in patients with splenic injury: a cross-sectional concordance study.
  25. Free intraperitoneal fluid on focused trauma ultrasonography and computed tomography grade of splenic injury: an analytical cross-sectional study.
  26. Splenic injury in haemodynamically stable and unstable patients: differences in imaging and associated organ injuries in a comparative cross-sectional study.
  27. Splenic trauma in younger and older adults: differences in mechanism, injury grade and associated injuries in a comparative cross-sectional study.
  28. Male and female patients with traumatic splenic injury: differences in mechanism and computed tomography findings in a comparative cross-sectional study.
  29. Splenic trauma with associated liver injury: clinical and radiological profile in a cross-sectional study.
  30. Splenic trauma with associated renal injury: anatomical and computed tomography characteristics in a cross-sectional study.
  31. Splenic and pancreatic injuries occurring together after blunt abdominal trauma: clinical and imaging characteristics in a cross-sectional study.
  32. Splenic injury with bowel or mesenteric trauma: computed tomography characteristics in a descriptive cross-sectional study.
  33. Multiple solid-organ injuries involving the spleen: radiological patterns in a cross-sectional study.
  34. Computed tomography predictors of operative exploration in patients with traumatic splenic injury during index admission: an analytical cross-sectional study.
  35. Operatively managed and non-operatively managed splenic trauma: differences in presenting clinical and computed tomography characteristics in a comparative cross-sectional study.
  36. Splenectomy and splenic preservation groups in traumatic injury: differences in preoperative injury characteristics in a comparative cross-sectional study.
  37. Gross operative morphology of traumatic splenic injuries and corresponding computed tomography findings: a cross-sectional correlation study.
  38. Traumatic splenic rupture with and without active bleeding on imaging: differences in presenting haemodynamic and laboratory parameters in a comparative cross-sectional study.
  39. Clinical, laboratory and computed tomography variables associated with high-grade splenic injury: an analytical cross-sectional study.
  40. Spectrum of traumatic splenic injuries encountered in a tertiary care general surgery emergency unit: a descriptive cross-sectional study.

Splenomegaly, Hypersplenism and Portal Hypertension-Related Splenic Disorders

  1. Splenomegaly in adult surgical patients: clinical, haematological and ultrasonographic profile in a descriptive cross-sectional study.
  2. Mild, moderate and massive splenomegaly: differences in clinical and haematological characteristics in a comparative cross-sectional study.
  3. Splenic length on ultrasonography and platelet count in patients with splenomegaly: an analytical cross-sectional study.
  4. Splenic volume and severity of thrombocytopenia in patients with hypersplenism: a cross-sectional study.
  5. Hypersplenism in patients with portal hypertension: clinical and haematological characteristics in a descriptive cross-sectional study.
  6. Portal hypertension-related and non-portal hypertensive splenomegaly: differences in ultrasonographic and laboratory findings in a comparative cross-sectional study.
  7. Splenic size and portal vein diameter in patients with portal hypertension: an analytical cross-sectional study.
  8. Splenomegaly and portosystemic collateral formation on ultrasonography: a cross-sectional imaging study.
  9. Platelet count and ultrasonographic spleen size as concurrent markers of portal hypertension: an analytical cross-sectional study.
  10. Thrombocytopenia in patients with splenomegaly and its relationship with splenic dimensions: a cross-sectional study.
  11. Pancytopenia in patients with massive splenomegaly: aetiological and haematological profile in a descriptive cross-sectional study.
  12. Bicytopenia and pancytopenia among patients with hypersplenism: differences in splenic size and underlying disease in a comparative cross-sectional study.
  13. Anaemia in patients with splenomegaly and its relationship with spleen size and portal hypertension: an analytical cross-sectional study.
  14. Leukopenia in hypersplenism and its relationship with splenic volume: a cross-sectional study.
  15. Splenic index on ultrasonography and peripheral blood cell counts in patients with hypersplenism: an analytical cross-sectional study.
  16. Massive splenomegaly in adults: spectrum of surgical and haematological causes in a descriptive cross-sectional study.
  17. Portal vein thrombosis in patients with splenomegaly: prevalence and imaging characteristics in a cross-sectional study.
  18. Extrahepatic portal vein obstruction and splenomegaly: clinical, haematological and ultrasonographic profile in a descriptive cross-sectional study.
  19. Cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic portal hypertension with splenomegaly: differences in spleen size and blood counts in a comparative cross-sectional study.
  20. Splenic vein thrombosis and isolated splenomegaly: clinical and computed tomography characteristics in a cross-sectional study.
  21. Left-sided portal hypertension due to splenic vein thrombosis: splenic and collateral venous findings in a descriptive cross-sectional study.
  22. Gastric varices in patients with splenic vein thrombosis and splenomegaly: a cross-sectional imaging study.
  23. Portal cavernoma and associated splenic enlargement: clinical and ultrasonographic characteristics in a cross-sectional study.
  24. Splenic enlargement in chronic liver disease and its relationship with platelet count and ascites: an analytical cross-sectional study.
  25. Splenomegaly in patients with chronic pancreatitis and splenic vein thrombosis: a cross-sectional study.
  26. Splenic size in patients with and without portal vein thrombosis: a comparative cross-sectional study.
  27. Palpable and non-palpable splenomegaly on clinical examination: agreement with ultrasonographic spleen size in a cross-sectional study.
  28. Clinical grading of splenomegaly and ultrasonographic splenic dimensions: a cross-sectional correlation study.
  29. Ultrasonography and computed tomography measurements of splenic size: agreement in a cross-sectional study.
  30. Splenic length and body habitus in adults with suspected splenomegaly: an analytical cross-sectional study.
  31. Splenomegaly in younger and older adults: differences in aetiology and haematological profile in a comparative cross-sectional study.
  32. Male and female patients with splenomegaly: differences in causes and ultrasonographic dimensions in a comparative cross-sectional study.
  33. Fever with splenomegaly in surgical referrals: spectrum of underlying abdominal pathologies in a descriptive cross-sectional study.
  34. Abdominal pain in patients with splenomegaly and its relationship with splenic size and focal lesions: a cross-sectional study.
  35. Left upper quadrant fullness and objective splenic enlargement on imaging: a diagnostic cross-sectional study.
  36. Massive splenomegaly with normal liver morphology: spectrum of underlying causes in a descriptive cross-sectional study.
  37. Splenomegaly with ascites and without ascites: differences in portal venous and haematological findings in a comparative cross-sectional study.
  38. Clinical, haematological and ultrasonographic variables associated with hypersplenism in patients with splenomegaly: an analytical cross-sectional study.
  39. Spectrum of surgically relevant causes of splenomegaly referred to a tertiary care hospital: a descriptive cross-sectional study.
  40. Spleen size, portal venous findings and cytopenias in adults with suspected hypersplenism: a hospital-based cross-sectional study.

Splenic Abscess, Cysts and Infective Splenic Lesions

  1. Splenic abscess in adults: clinical, laboratory and imaging characteristics in a descriptive cross-sectional study.
  2. Solitary and multiple splenic abscesses: differences in clinical and computed tomography findings in a comparative cross-sectional study.
  3. Splenic abscess size and severity of inflammatory laboratory abnormalities: an analytical cross-sectional study.
  4. Splenic abscess in diabetic and non-diabetic patients: differences in clinical and imaging characteristics in a comparative cross-sectional study.
  5. Fever with left upper quadrant pain and imaging-confirmed splenic abscess: clinical profile in a cross-sectional study.
  6. Splenic abscess with and without bacteraemia: differences in clinical and radiological characteristics in a comparative cross-sectional study.
  7. Gas-forming splenic abscess: clinical and computed tomography characteristics in a descriptive cross-sectional study.
  8. Multiloculated splenic abscess and its relationship with inflammatory markers: an analytical cross-sectional study.
  9. Splenic abscess with associated liver abscess: clinical and imaging profile in a cross-sectional study.
  10. Splenic abscess secondary to infective endocarditis and other sources of septic emboli: imaging characteristics in a descriptive cross-sectional study.
  11. Splenic infarct with secondary abscess formation: clinical and computed tomography characteristics in a cross-sectional study.
  12. Tuberculous splenic lesions in adults: clinical and imaging spectrum in a descriptive cross-sectional study.
  13. Isolated splenic tuberculosis and disseminated abdominal tuberculosis involving the spleen: differences in imaging findings in a comparative cross-sectional study.
  14. Multiple hypodense splenic lesions in tuberculosis and splenic abscess: comparative computed tomography characteristics in a cross-sectional study.
  15. Granulomatous and pyogenic splenic lesions: differences in clinical and imaging characteristics in a comparative cross-sectional study.
  16. Splenic cysts in adults: clinical and radiological spectrum in a descriptive cross-sectional study.
  17. Primary and secondary splenic cysts: differences in demographic and imaging characteristics in a comparative cross-sectional study.
  18. Parasitic and non-parasitic splenic cysts: differences in imaging morphology in a comparative cross-sectional study.
  19. Splenic hydatid cyst at presentation: clinical, serological and imaging characteristics in a descriptive cross-sectional study.
  20. Isolated splenic hydatid cyst and multiorgan hydatid disease involving the spleen: comparative imaging characteristics in a cross-sectional study.
  21. Unilocular and multilocular splenic cysts: differences in size, calcification and internal septations in a comparative cross-sectional study.
  22. Splenic cyst wall calcification and underlying cyst type: a cross-sectional imaging study.
  23. Symptomatic and incidentally detected splenic cysts: differences in size and anatomical location in a comparative cross-sectional study.
  24. Giant splenic cysts presenting with abdominal mass or fullness: clinical and imaging characteristics in a descriptive cross-sectional study.
  25. Upper pole, lower pole and hilar splenic cysts: differences in symptom profile and adjacent organ compression in a comparative cross-sectional study.
  26. Splenic cyst size and presence of abdominal pain or early satiety: an analytical cross-sectional study.
  27. Splenic epidermoid cysts in young adults: clinical and imaging profile in a descriptive cross-sectional study.
  28. Splenic pseudocyst following prior trauma: clinical and computed tomography characteristics in a cross-sectional study.
  29. Post-traumatic and congenital splenic cysts: differences in wall calcification and internal morphology in a comparative cross-sectional study.
  30. Ultrasonography and computed tomography in characterization of splenic cystic lesions: a comparative diagnostic cross-sectional study.
  31. Simple and complex splenic cysts: differences in sonographic and computed tomography characteristics in a comparative cross-sectional study.
  32. Splenic cysts with and without internal debris: spectrum of underlying pathology in a cross-sectional study.
  33. Splenic lesions with cystic degeneration: imaging characteristics and differential diagnosis in a descriptive cross-sectional study.
  34. Splenic abscess and splenic cyst: computed tomography features useful for differentiation in a diagnostic cross-sectional study.
  35. Infected splenic cysts: clinical, laboratory and imaging characteristics in a descriptive cross-sectional study.
  36. Splenic hydatid cyst and non-parasitic splenic cyst: comparative imaging features in a cross-sectional study.
  37. Splenic cystic lesions with adjacent gastric or renal compression: prevalence and anatomical characteristics in a cross-sectional study.
  38. Clinical, laboratory and imaging variables distinguishing infective from non-infective splenic cystic lesions: an analytical cross-sectional study.
  39. Spectrum of cystic and infective splenic lesions referred for surgical evaluation: a descriptive cross-sectional study.
  40. Splenic abscesses and cysts encountered in a tertiary care general surgery department: a hospital-based cross-sectional study.

Splenic Infarction, Vascular Disorders and Atraumatic Splenic Emergencies

  1. Splenic infarction in adults: clinical, laboratory and computed tomography profile in a descriptive cross-sectional study.
  2. Solitary and multiple splenic infarcts: differences in aetiology and radiological characteristics in a comparative cross-sectional study.
  3. Peripheral wedge-shaped and central splenic infarcts: differences in vascular associations in a comparative cross-sectional study.
  4. Splenic infarct size and severity of left upper quadrant pain at presentation: an analytical cross-sectional study.
  5. Splenic infarction with and without splenomegaly: differences in underlying causes and computed tomography findings in a comparative cross-sectional study.
  6. Splenic artery thrombosis and splenic infarction: computed tomography angiography characteristics in a cross-sectional study.
  7. Splenic vein thrombosis and splenic parenchymal abnormalities: a cross-sectional imaging study.
  8. Portal, splenic and mesenteric venous thrombosis involving the splenic circulation: comparative computed tomography characteristics in a cross-sectional study.
  9. Splenic infarction in patients with pancreatitis and non-pancreatic causes: differences in imaging distribution in a comparative cross-sectional study.
  10. Splenic infarction associated with haematological disorders and thromboembolic disease: clinical and imaging profile in a cross-sectional study.
  11. Splenic artery aneurysm detected incidentally on abdominal imaging: prevalence and anatomical characteristics in a descriptive cross-sectional study.
  12. True and pseudoaneurysms of the splenic artery: differences in causes and computed tomography angiography morphology in a comparative cross-sectional study.
  13. Splenic artery aneurysm size and presence of calcification or mural thrombus: an analytical imaging cross-sectional study.
  14. Proximal, middle and distal splenic artery aneurysms: anatomical distribution in a descriptive cross-sectional study.
  15. Splenic artery pseudoaneurysm secondary to pancreatitis: clinical and computed tomography angiography profile in a cross-sectional study.
  16. Traumatic and pancreatitis-related splenic artery pseudoaneurysms: comparative imaging characteristics in a cross-sectional study.
  17. Haemorrhagic pancreatic collections and associated splenic arterial abnormalities: a cross-sectional study.
  18. Splenic artery aneurysm with and without splenic infarction: differences in vascular imaging findings in a comparative cross-sectional study.
  19. Spontaneous splenic rupture in adults: clinical, laboratory and computed tomography characteristics in a descriptive cross-sectional study.
  20. Traumatic and atraumatic splenic rupture: differences in splenic morphology and underlying disease in a comparative cross-sectional study.
  21. Atraumatic splenic rupture in patients with splenomegaly: clinical and imaging characteristics in a cross-sectional study.
  22. Atraumatic splenic rupture associated with infection, malignancy and haematological disease: aetiological spectrum in a descriptive cross-sectional study.
  23. Hemoperitoneum due to atraumatic splenic pathology: computed tomography findings in a cross-sectional study.
  24. Splenic rupture with underlying focal splenic lesion: imaging characteristics in a descriptive cross-sectional study.
  25. Splenic torsion in wandering spleen: clinical and computed tomography characteristics in a descriptive cross-sectional study.
  26. Wandering spleen in adults: anatomical position, vascular pedicle and associated complications in a cross-sectional study.
  27. Torsed and non-torsed wandering spleen: differences in vascular and parenchymal imaging findings in a comparative cross-sectional study.
  28. Accessory spleens detected on abdominal imaging: prevalence, number and anatomical distribution in a cross-sectional study.
  29. Accessory spleen size and location in relation to the splenic hilum and pancreatic tail: an anatomical cross-sectional study.
  30. Intrapancreatic accessory spleen and pancreatic tail lesion: imaging features useful for differentiation in a diagnostic cross-sectional study.
  31. Polysplenia and other congenital splenic anomalies detected on imaging: anatomical spectrum in a descriptive cross-sectional study.
  32. Asplenia and hyposplenia detected incidentally on abdominal imaging: associated congenital findings in a cross-sectional study.
  33. Splenic notches, lobulations and other morphological variants on computed tomography: an anatomical cross-sectional study.
  34. Splenic artery tortuosity and age-related vascular changes on computed tomography angiography: an analytical cross-sectional study.
  35. Splenic hilar vascular anatomy in adults undergoing abdominal computed tomography angiography: a descriptive cross-sectional study.
  36. Number and branching pattern of segmental splenic arteries on computed tomography angiography: an anatomical cross-sectional study.
  37. Splenic venous anatomy and common anatomical variants on cross-sectional imaging: a descriptive cross-sectional study.
  38. Clinical and imaging variables associated with splenic infarction among patients with splenic vascular disorders: an analytical cross-sectional study.
  39. Spectrum of vascular and atraumatic emergency splenic disorders presenting to a general surgery department: a descriptive cross-sectional study.
  40. Computed tomography angiographic characteristics of surgically relevant splenic vascular pathologies: a hospital-based cross-sectional study.

Splenic Tumours, Focal Lesions and Surgical Splenic Pathologies

  1. Focal splenic lesions detected on abdominal imaging: clinical and radiological spectrum in a descriptive cross-sectional study.
  2. Benign and suspicious splenic masses: differences in size, margin and enhancement pattern in a comparative cross-sectional study.
  3. Solitary and multiple focal splenic lesions: differences in underlying diagnoses and imaging characteristics in a comparative cross-sectional study.
  4. Incidentally detected splenic lesions in adults undergoing abdominal computed tomography: prevalence and morphological spectrum in a cross-sectional study.
  5. Hypodense splenic lesions on computed tomography: spectrum of benign, infective and malignant causes in a descriptive cross-sectional study.
  6. Hyperechoic and hypoechoic splenic lesions on ultrasonography: comparative computed tomography characteristics in a cross-sectional study.
  7. Splenic hemangioma at imaging: size, location and enhancement characteristics in a descriptive cross-sectional study.
  8. Small and large splenic hemangiomas: differences in imaging morphology in a comparative cross-sectional study.
  9. Splenic lymphangioma in adults: clinical and radiological characteristics in a descriptive cross-sectional study.
  10. Splenic hemangioma and lymphangioma: differences in ultrasonographic and computed tomography appearance in a comparative cross-sectional study.
  11. Splenic hamartoma at presentation: clinical and imaging characteristics in a descriptive cross-sectional study.
  12. Hypervascular splenic lesions and their differential diagnosis on computed tomography: a cross-sectional imaging study.
  13. Splenic lymphoma at presentation: clinical, haematological and computed tomography profile in a descriptive cross-sectional study.
  14. Primary and secondary splenic involvement by lymphoma: differences in splenic morphology and lymphadenopathy patterns in a comparative cross-sectional study.
  15. Diffuse and focal splenic involvement in lymphoma: comparative computed tomography characteristics in a cross-sectional study.
  16. Splenomegaly with focal lesions in suspected lymphoma: clinical and imaging profile in a cross-sectional study.
  17. Splenic metastases in patients with known malignancy: prevalence and primary tumour distribution in a cross-sectional study.
  18. Solitary and multiple splenic metastases: differences in imaging characteristics and associated metastatic disease in a comparative cross-sectional study.
  19. Splenic lesions in patients with gastrointestinal and non-gastrointestinal malignancies: comparative imaging patterns in a cross-sectional study.
  20. Splenic lesions with and without lymphadenopathy: differences in likely underlying pathology in a comparative cross-sectional study.
  21. Splenic mass lesions with internal necrosis and calcification: spectrum of underlying diagnoses in a descriptive cross-sectional study.
  22. Splenic lesion size and presence of abdominal pain or splenomegaly: an analytical cross-sectional study.
  23. Upper pole and lower pole splenic masses: differences in adjacent organ compression and clinical presentation in a comparative cross-sectional study.
  24. Computed tomography enhancement patterns in benign and malignant splenic lesions: a comparative diagnostic cross-sectional study.
  25. Ultrasonography and computed tomography in characterization of focal splenic masses: a comparative diagnostic cross-sectional study.
  26. Clinical and imaging variables distinguishing infective from neoplastic splenic lesions: an analytical cross-sectional study.
  27. Splenic mass with fever and splenic mass without fever: differences in imaging and laboratory characteristics in a comparative cross-sectional study.
  28. Splenic lesions with normal and elevated inflammatory markers: differences in diagnostic spectrum in a comparative cross-sectional study.
  29. Splenic lesions associated with anaemia, thrombocytopenia or pancytopenia: haematological and imaging characteristics in a cross-sectional study.
  30. Splenectomy specimens for non-traumatic splenic disease: clinicopathological spectrum in a descriptive cross-sectional study.
  31. Preoperative imaging diagnosis and histopathological diagnosis in patients undergoing splenectomy for focal splenic lesions: a cross-sectional concordance study.
  32. Gross morphology of splenectomy specimens and corresponding histopathological diagnoses: a cross-sectional correlation study.
  33. Traumatic and non-traumatic indications for splenectomy during index hospitalisation: a comparative cross-sectional study.
  34. Elective and emergency splenectomy cases: differences in underlying pathology and preoperative splenic characteristics in a comparative cross-sectional study.
  35. Splenic preservation and splenectomy in surgically managed splenic disease: differences in presenting anatomical and pathological factors in a comparative cross-sectional study.
  36. Accessory spleens identified during splenectomy and their anatomical distribution: an observational cross-sectional study.
  37. Operative splenic size and preoperative ultrasonographic or computed tomography measurements: a cross-sectional agreement study.
  38. Clinical, laboratory and imaging variables associated with the need for splenectomy in non-traumatic splenic disease: an analytical cross-sectional study.
  39. Spectrum of surgically relevant focal splenic lesions evaluated at a tertiary care hospital in India: a descriptive cross-sectional study.
  40. Clinical, haematological, radiological and operative characteristics of splenic pathologies managed in a general surgery department during a single hospital admission: a hospital-based cross-sectional study.

Not the general surgery subspeciality you need? Splenic pathologies is one section of our full general surgery collection — the hub page lists every subspeciality, each with its own free topic list. Updated October 2026.

Browse all Gen Surgery Thesis Topics →

📌 Updated for 2026–2027 MS/DNB General Surgery Splenic Pathologies admissions

The topic framework has been reviewed for feasibility in emergency surgery, outpatient imaging and hospital-based splenic disease research.

  • Most observational topics can use trauma records, full blood counts, routine ultrasonography and existing contrast-enhanced computed tomography, without a research-only scan.
  • Angiographic assessment, embolisation records and splenectomy histopathology are needed only for questions specifically addressing vascular intervention or tissue diagnosis.
  • Clear separation of imaging description, clinical severity and verified diagnosis supports publishable diagnostic concordance and risk-factor analyses.
Generate a protocol from any topic above

Select Generate Protocol → beside any title in the list above and receive a submission-ready document built around that topic, containing all eighteen components:

  • Introduction / Synopsis
  • Research Question
  • Aim of the Study
  • Primary Objective
  • Secondary Objectives
  • Materials and Methods
  • Inclusion Criteria
  • Exclusion Criteria
  • Sample Size Calculation
  • Methodology
  • Statistical Analysis
  • Ethical Considerations
  • Review of Literature
  • References
  • Gantt Chart / Study Timeline
  • Patient Information Sheet
  • Consent Form
  • Data Collection Form

Already have your thesis title?

Generate the full splenic pathologies protocol directly — objectives, methodology, sample size, statistics, timeline, references and annexures.

Generate your protocol

Alongside splenic pathologies protocols and synopses, support is also available for departmental presentations, journal club presentations, ethics committee presentations, and posters and oral presentations for medical conferences — for postgraduate residents, board trainees and research scholars across India and the GCC. Prepared by a practising doctor with long experience in medical publishing and thesis supervision.

Enquire on WhatsApp →

Splenic pathologies research outside India

The topics above work as research questions anywhere — what changes is the document the institution expects, and who approves it before data collection begins. The Gulf equivalent of an Indian synopsis is the splenic pathologies research proposal submitted to an institutional review board, and it ordinarily carries three sections an Indian synopsis does not: a Gantt chart, a budget and resources section, and a Declaration of Helsinki statement.

Board and residency programmes — country by country

Saudi Arabia — SCFHS and the Saudi Board. Residency and fellowship training under the Saudi Commission for Health Specialties includes a research project with a set timeline, and the splenic pathologies research proposal is the document prepared at the outset and cleared by the institutional review board before recruitment starts.

United Arab Emirates — DHA, DOH Abu Dhabi and MOHAP. Residents training in Dubai, Abu Dhabi and the northern emirates prepare a splenic pathologies research protocol for their programme and submit it for institutional review board approval before any data are collected.

Qatar — DHP (formerly QCHP) and Hamad Medical Corporation. A splenic pathologies IRB proposal is reviewed before recruitment, with the ethics section written to the institution's own template rather than a generic one.

Bahrain — NHRA. Trainees turning splenic pathologies research topics into a project need the proposal cleared by their institutional research and ethics committee before fieldwork begins.

Oman — OMSB. Residency programmes under the Oman Medical Specialty Board include a research component, and the splenic pathologies research proposal is the document assessed at the start of it.

Kuwait — KIMS. A splenic pathologies study protocol goes to the institutional committee for approval before the project begins.

Arab Board programmes across the region. The Arab Board carries its own research requirement irrespective of the host country, and the splenic pathologies proposal follows the same structure throughout.

Generate a splenic pathologies research proposal →

Postgraduate degrees — Malaysia, the Gulf and beyond

Malaysia — MMed, the National Medical Research Register and MREC. A splenic pathologies dissertation proposal for a Master of Medicine programme carried out in a Ministry of Health facility must be registered on the NMRR and approved by the Medical Research and Ethics Committee before the study begins, and the guidance asks for submission four to six months ahead of data collection. Every investigator on the study team registers on the NMRR as well, so the methodology, ethics and team sections are written in far more detail than an Indian synopsis requires.

PhD and Master's candidates elsewhere. University programmes generally require a full splenic pathologies research proposal of roughly 6,000 to 10,000 words, with an extended literature review, a theoretical framework and a detailed methodology chapter.

PhD and MMed proposals are written individually by a medical doctor and revised until the supervisor accepts them. They are not produced by the automated protocol generator.

Enquire about a splenic pathologies PhD or MMed proposal →

🔥 Trending research areas in Splenic Pathologies for 2026–27

These are practical areas for focused surgical research rather than indications for additional investigations.

  • CT vascular injury signs, including contrast blush and pseudoaneurysm, in relation to actual haemodynamic status and subsequent management decisions.
  • Non-operative splenic trauma pathways, including documentation of observation, angiography and the distinction between injury grade and treatment selection.
  • Splenic size measurements and cytopenias in portal hypertension, with attention to competing causes of low blood counts.
  • Incidental focal splenic lesions and the differing evidentiary value of follow-up imaging, microbiology and histopathology.

Protocol and synopsis guidance

What a Splenic Pathologies protocol must contain

Clinical entry point: State whether the population comprises all blunt abdominal trauma presentations, only CT-confirmed splenic injuries, splenomegaly referrals, or patients with focal splenic lesions. These groups have different denominators and cannot be merged to estimate disease prevalence.

Trauma baseline: Record haemodynamic observations and resuscitation status at a prespecified time, CT acquisition timing, injury grade using a named classification version, associated injuries, vascular findings and management pathway. A high CT grade does not by itself mean that splenectomy is required.

Non-trauma definitions: Define splenomegaly measurement method and threshold, laboratory criteria for cytopenia, assessment of competing haematological or hepatic disease, and whether a lesion diagnosis is suspected, clinically established or tissue-confirmed. Prespecify how missing CT, laboratory and histopathology information will be handled.

Splenic Pathologies synopsis versus Splenic Pathologies protocol

Synopsis: Summarises the clinical question, rationale, objectives, setting, intended sample, study design and broad analysis in a form suitable for departmental and ethics review.

Protocol: Converts each term into an operational rule: which trauma arrivals are eligible, what constitutes haemodynamic instability, how CT injury grade and vascular blush are recorded, whether conservative management includes splenic artery embolisation, and which time point defines the outcome. For hypersplenism, establish that splenomegaly and low counts are not alone sufficient to attribute cytopenia to splenic sequestration.

Diagnostic reference: A surgical specimen is a strong reference for certain focal lesions but is available mainly in selected operated patients. For non-operated patients, a justified alternative such as predefined follow-up or multidisciplinary final diagnosis must be specified, rather than treating an unverified imaging impression as histopathology.

Sample size and statistical analysis

Match the calculation to the primary question: A prevalence study requires an anticipated proportion, absolute precision and confidence level; a two-group comparison requires an expected clinically meaningful difference; an association study needs sufficient outcome events for the number of covariates proposed. Estimate case availability from actual department records, especially for uncommon splenic abscesses, aneurysms and tumours.

Appropriate methods: Use proportions with confidence intervals for descriptive diagnoses, chi-square or Fisher's exact tests for categorical comparisons, and suitable parametric or non-parametric methods for continuous measures. Use logistic regression only when event counts support it; report effect estimates and confidence intervals instead of relying on P values alone.

Different questions require different statistics: CT grade versus clinical severity is an association question, ultrasonography versus CT size measurements require agreement analysis rather than correlation alone, and diagnostic sensitivity or specificity require an independently justified reference standard applied beyond test-positive cases. Adjust trauma analyses for injury burden and physiological severity when feasible.

Frequently Asked Questions – Splenic Pathologies (2026–27)

1. How do I choose a feasible Splenic Pathologies thesis topic for 2026–2027?

Begin with the number of eligible cases seen in one thesis period and the completeness of trauma notes, serial haemoglobin results, ultrasonography, CT and operative registers. CT grade and haemodynamic status in splenic trauma may be feasible in a busy emergency unit; splenic neoplasm histopathology may not yield enough consecutive cases without a longer retrospective period.

2. Which study designs are suitable for splenic surgical pathology research?

Cross-sectional descriptions suit injury patterns, splenomegaly profiles and incidental lesions. Retrospective cohort designs are preferable when studying outcomes after a defined exposure or management decision. Diagnostic accuracy designs require an explicit reference standard and verification of test-negative patients; agreement designs suit paired size measurements or reader classifications.

3. What should I settle with my guide before beginning a splenic study?

Agree on a single primary objective, the recruitment setting, adult or paediatric eligibility, CT availability, the chosen splenic injury scale, baseline physiological measurements, operative and non-operative categories, and how to deal with referrals already resuscitated elsewhere. Confirm that the intended denominator can actually be reconstructed from the records.

4. Can I complete a splenic trauma thesis using retrospective hospital records?

Yes, if injury grading, arrival physiology, imaging times, management decisions and the defined outcome are retrievable. CT-only registries omit unstable patients taken directly to theatre and can bias the observed relation between CT grade, haemodynamic instability and operation. State this selection limitation explicitly.

5. What is the difference between a Splenic Pathologies synopsis and a protocol?

The synopsis gives a concise justification, objectives and study plan. The full protocol fixes eligibility, exposures, outcome definitions, sample-size assumptions, timing of observations, reference diagnoses, confidentiality procedures and a prespecified statistical plan so that another researcher could reproduce the work.

6. What ethical permissions are needed for splenic pathology research?

Obtain institutional ethics approval before prospective enrolment and seek a documented waiver where eligible for retrospective, de-identified record review. Consent is needed for extra study-specific procedures; standard-care CT, contrast and blood sampling should not be repeated solely for research. Specify privacy protection for PACS and DICOM identifiers, including reconstructed data. For children, obtain guardian consent and age-appropriate assent, commonly from about seven years according to local ethics requirements. Separate permission is needed for identifiable operative photographs or video. A suspected splenic pseudoaneurysm, active haemorrhage or other urgent incidental finding must be escalated promptly to the treating surgeon through an explicitly named clinical pathway.

7. Can CT splenic injury grade predict the need for splenectomy?

Not on its own. CT grade describes anatomy, whereas splenectomy decisions also depend on haemodynamic response to resuscitation, ongoing bleeding, associated injuries and available interventional radiology. An analysis restricted to patients who received CT excludes some unstable patients operated on immediately. Prespecify the population and timing, distinguish splenectomy from embolisation and observation, and avoid interpreting an association with treatment choice as proof of biological injury severity.

8. Can splenic pathology research support PhD or Gulf board research requirements?

Yes, with adaptation to the applicable programme. An MD/DNB synopsis is generally a time-limited institutional dissertation proposal, whereas a PhD proposal usually demands a broader original research programme. SCFHS and Saudi Board training includes mandatory research-project requirements, and candidates following Arab Board of Health Specializations or DHP, DHA, DOH and MOHAP-linked pathways must verify their current programme-specific approval, supervision and submission rules. A splenic trauma audit or diagnostic study can provide a foundation but is not automatically accepted by every board.

9. When should I register my Splenic Pathologies thesis topic?

Seek guide approval and institutional registration before extracting identifiable records or beginning prospective recruitment. Finalise the case definition and data sheet early enough to pilot a small number of records and correct missing-variable problems before the formal collection period.

Found a topic that fits your department?

Generate its full protocol — objectives, methodology, sample size, statistics, timeline, references and annexures — in editable format.

Generate your protocol
Don`t copy text!
Generate Thesis Protocol / Synopsis
×