Choosing MS General Surgery laparoscopic thesis topics or DNB General Surgery laparoscopic dissertation topics is easier when the question matches operative volume and routinely documented clinical data. These laparoscopic surgery research topics cover cholecystectomy, appendectomy, inguinal and ventral hernia repair, colorectal resection, fundoplication, bariatric surgery, splenectomy, adrenalectomy and diagnostic or therapeutic laparoscopy. Feasible descriptive, comparative and analytical observational studies may combine admission records, laboratory results, ultrasonography or CT, operation notes, anaesthesia records and histopathology where available. The collection of laparoscopic surgical thesis topics for postgraduate residents can be narrowed to a focused question before preparing a thesis synopsis and research protocol.
Last reviewed and updated: · all 300 topics checked for 2026–2027 admissions
Our MS General Surgery Thesis Guidance covers operative outcome definitions (Clavien–Dindo grading, CDC surgical site infection criteria), follow-up schedules, and institutional review board (IRB) layout guides.
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Preoperative clinical and ultrasonographic predictors of difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis: an analytical cross-sectional study correlating gallbladder wall thickness, impacted neck stone, adhesions and operative difficulty.
Gallbladder wall thickness on ultrasonography and intraoperative difficulty during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a cross-sectional correlation study assessing Calot triangle dissection, gallbladder handling and need for bailout procedures.
Impacted Hartmann pouch stone as a predictor of difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an analytical cross-sectional study correlating preoperative ultrasonography with intraoperative anatomy and dissection difficulty.
Contracted gallbladder on preoperative ultrasonography and operative complexity during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparative cross-sectional study of contracted and non-contracted gallbladders.
Male and female patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallstone disease: a comparative cross-sectional study of clinical presentation, gallbladder inflammation and operative difficulty.
Diabetic and non-diabetic patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparative cross-sectional study of gallbladder wall changes, adhesions and intraoperative difficulty.
Obesity and technical difficulty during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an analytical cross-sectional study evaluating body mass index, trocar access, liver retraction and Calot triangle exposure.
Previous attacks of acute cholecystitis and current operative findings during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a cross-sectional study of adhesions, fibrosis and difficult dissection.
Elective and emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparative cross-sectional study of clinical profile, ultrasonographic findings and intraoperative complexity.
Solitary and multiple gallstones in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparative cross-sectional study of gallbladder morphology, inflammation and operative findings.
Gallstone size and operative difficulty during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an analytical cross-sectional study correlating stone burden with gallbladder distension, grasping difficulty and dissection.
Pericholecystic fluid on ultrasonography and intraoperative inflammatory severity during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a cross-sectional correlation study.
Fatty liver and difficulty of gallbladder exposure during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an analytical cross-sectional study evaluating liver size, retraction and operative anatomy.
Preoperative scoring systems for predicting difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a diagnostic cross-sectional study comparing clinical and ultrasonographic variables with intraoperative difficulty grading.
Clinical and ultrasonographic predictors of conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy: an analytical cross-sectional study among patients undergoing surgery for gallstone disease.
Cystic duct anatomical variations encountered during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a descriptive cross-sectional study documenting length, diameter, insertion pattern and operative implications.
Cystic artery variations during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a descriptive cross-sectional study of number, origin, branching pattern and relationship to Calot triangle.
Rouviere sulcus as a surgical landmark during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a cross-sectional observational study assessing visibility, morphology and relation to safe dissection.
Achievement of the critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy and factors associated with difficulty in obtaining it: an analytical cross-sectional study.
Gallbladder adhesions to the omentum, duodenum and colon during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a descriptive cross-sectional study of prevalence and associated preoperative predictors.
Fundus-first and conventional Calot-first dissection during difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparative cross-sectional study of baseline anatomy and operative indications.
Subtotal cholecystectomy during difficult laparoscopic gallbladder surgery: a descriptive cross-sectional study of preoperative predictors, intraoperative indications and anatomical findings.
Gallbladder perforation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy and associated operative factors: an analytical cross-sectional study evaluating wall thickness, inflammation and dissection difficulty.
Bile and gallstone spillage during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a cross-sectional study of gallbladder pathology, operative circumstances and immediate intraoperative management.
Bleeding during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a cross-sectional study of anatomical source, gallbladder inflammation and intraoperative control techniques.
Operative time during laparoscopic cholecystectomy and its relationship with preoperative clinical and ultrasonographic variables: an analytical cross-sectional study.
Common bile duct diameter and liver biochemical abnormalities in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an analytical cross-sectional study of predictors of occult choledocholithiasis.
Ultrasonography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients selected for laparoscopic cholecystectomy with suspected common bile duct stones: a comparative diagnostic cross-sectional study.
Intraoperative anatomical reasons for modification of standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy technique: a descriptive cross-sectional study of difficult gallbladder surgery.
Clinical, ultrasonographic and operative spectrum of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a tertiary care general surgery department: a hospital-based descriptive cross-sectional study.
Laparoscopic Appendectomy
Acute appendicitis managed by laparoscopic appendectomy: clinical, laboratory, imaging and operative profile in a descriptive cross-sectional study.
Uncomplicated and complicated acute appendicitis undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy: a comparative cross-sectional study of clinical, laboratory and intraoperative findings.
Alvarado score and laparoscopic operative severity of acute appendicitis: a cross-sectional correlation study among patients undergoing appendectomy.
Appendicular diameter on ultrasonography and operative severity during laparoscopic appendectomy: an analytical cross-sectional study.
Computed tomography findings and laparoscopic operative diagnosis in acute appendicitis: a cross-sectional concordance study.
Appendicolith and severity of appendiceal inflammation at laparoscopic appendectomy: an analytical cross-sectional study.
Perforated and non-perforated appendicitis: a comparative cross-sectional study of clinical presentation, laboratory markers and laparoscopic findings.
Gangrenous and non-gangrenous appendicitis: differences in preoperative inflammatory markers and operative characteristics in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Retrocecal and pelvic appendix positions: differences in clinical presentation and operative difficulty during laparoscopic appendectomy in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Anatomical position of the appendix and localisation of abdominal tenderness in acute appendicitis: a cross-sectional clinicopathological study.
Male and female patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy: a comparative cross-sectional study of clinical presentation and alternative pelvic findings.
Obese and non-obese patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy: differences in port placement, exposure and operative difficulty in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Acute appendicitis in younger and older adults: differences in presentation, perforation and operative findings in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Delay in presentation and complicated appendicitis among patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy: an analytical cross-sectional study.
Leucocyte count and laparoscopic severity of appendicitis: a cross-sectional analytical study.
Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and intraoperative severity of acute appendicitis: an analytical cross-sectional study.
C-reactive protein level and complicated appendicitis at laparoscopic surgery: a cross-sectional study.
Hyperbilirubinemia and perforated appendicitis among patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy: a diagnostic cross-sectional study.
Appendix base inflammation and choice of stump-closure technique during laparoscopic appendectomy: an observational cross-sectional study.
Endoloop and clip closure of the appendiceal stump: a comparative cross-sectional study of appendix-base characteristics and intraoperative technical parameters.
Intracorporeal knotting and commercial ligation devices for appendiceal stump closure: differences in operative anatomy and procedure characteristics in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Three-port and reduced-port laparoscopic appendectomy: a comparative cross-sectional study of baseline patient and appendiceal characteristics.
Operative time during laparoscopic appendectomy and its relationship with appendiceal position, perforation and contamination: an analytical cross-sectional study.
Difficult laparoscopic appendectomy and its preoperative clinical and imaging predictors: an analytical cross-sectional study.
Conversion to open surgery during laparoscopic appendectomy: a cross-sectional study of anatomical and inflammatory factors associated with conversion.
Appendicular mass and abscess encountered at laparoscopy: clinical, imaging and operative characteristics in a descriptive cross-sectional study.
Pelvic contamination and generalised peritoneal contamination in perforated appendicitis: differences in operative findings in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Laparoscopic lavage requirement during appendectomy and preoperative predictors of intra-abdominal contamination: an analytical cross-sectional study.
Alternative intra-abdominal diagnoses identified during laparoscopy for suspected appendicitis: a descriptive cross-sectional study.
Clinical, radiological, laparoscopic and histopathological spectrum of acute appendicitis treated by laparoscopic appendectomy: a hospital-based cross-sectional study.
Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in adults: clinical, anatomical and operative profile in a descriptive cross-sectional study.
Direct and indirect inguinal hernias undergoing laparoscopic repair: differences in patient characteristics, defect morphology and operative anatomy in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Unilateral and bilateral inguinal hernias treated laparoscopically: differences in defect size, anatomical complexity and operative parameters in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Primary and recurrent inguinal hernias undergoing laparoscopic repair: a comparative cross-sectional study of preperitoneal anatomy and operative difficulty.
Transabdominal preperitoneal and totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: differences in baseline hernia characteristics and operative selection in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Hernial defect size and mesh size during laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: an analytical cross-sectional study.
Inguinal hernia defect type and choice of mesh fixation technique during laparoscopic repair: an observational cross-sectional study.
Large and small inguinal hernia defects: differences in sac dissection and mesh requirements during laparoscopic repair in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Incomplete and complete inguinoscrotal hernias managed laparoscopically: differences in sac anatomy and operative difficulty in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Sliding and non-sliding inguinal hernias encountered during laparoscopic repair: differences in anatomy and dissection complexity in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Cord lipoma during laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: prevalence, anatomical characteristics and relationship with hernia type in a cross-sectional study.
Occult contralateral inguinal hernia detected during transabdominal laparoscopic repair: prevalence and anatomical characteristics in a cross-sectional study.
Femoral hernia identified during laparoscopic surgery for presumed inguinal hernia: prevalence and operative anatomy in a descriptive cross-sectional study.
Pantaloon hernia encountered during laparoscopic inguinal repair: clinical and operative characteristics in a cross-sectional study.
Inferior epigastric vessel anatomy and hernia classification during laparoscopic inguinal repair: a cross-sectional anatomical study.
Corona mortis encountered during laparoscopic groin hernia surgery: prevalence and anatomical characteristics in a descriptive cross-sectional study.
Iliopubic tract and Cooper ligament identification during laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a cross-sectional anatomical study.
Peritoneal sac adhesions and operative difficulty during laparoscopic repair of recurrent inguinal hernia: an analytical cross-sectional study.
Previous lower abdominal surgery and difficulty during totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a comparative cross-sectional study.
Obesity and technical complexity during laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: an analytical cross-sectional study of preperitoneal dissection and mesh placement.
Younger and older adults undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: differences in hernia type and defect morphology in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Mesh fixation and non-fixation during laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: differences in baseline defect characteristics in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Tack and suture fixation of mesh during laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: differences in anatomy and fixation requirements in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Self-fixating and conventional mesh use during laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: differences in hernia characteristics in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Peritoneal closure techniques during transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a comparative cross-sectional study of operative characteristics.
Operative time and anatomical complexity during laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: an analytical cross-sectional study.
Peritoneal breach during totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair and associated patient and hernia factors: a cross-sectional study.
Conversion from totally extraperitoneal to transabdominal or open inguinal hernia repair: anatomical causes and associated predictors in a cross-sectional study.
Intraoperative complications during laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair and their relationship with hernia anatomy: an analytical cross-sectional study.
Clinical and operative spectrum of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in a tertiary care general surgery unit: a descriptive cross-sectional study.
Laparoscopic Ventral and Incisional Hernia Repair
Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair in adults: clinical, defect-related and operative profile in a descriptive cross-sectional study.
Primary ventral and incisional hernias undergoing laparoscopic repair: differences in defect morphology and operative characteristics in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Umbilical and paraumbilical hernias managed laparoscopically: differences in defect size and mesh requirements in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Small, medium and large ventral hernia defects: differences in operative technique and mesh overlap in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Hernial defect size and mesh dimensions during laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: an analytical cross-sectional study.
Obesity and defect size in patients undergoing laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a cross-sectional analytical study.
Primary and recurrent ventral hernias: differences in adhesions and operative complexity during laparoscopic repair in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Previous abdominal surgery and severity of intraperitoneal adhesions during laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: an analytical cross-sectional study.
Number of previous laparotomies and adhesiolysis difficulty during laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: a cross-sectional study.
Midline and lateral incisional hernias: differences in defect anatomy and mesh placement during laparoscopic repair in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Single and multiple incisional defects encountered during laparoscopy: differences in mesh planning in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Swiss-cheese incisional hernias: defect distribution and operative strategy in a descriptive cross-sectional study.
Laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair and minimally invasive retromuscular repair: differences in baseline defect characteristics in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Defect closure and bridging techniques during laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: differences in defect size and morphology in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Transfascial sutures and tack fixation of mesh: differences in defect characteristics and fixation pattern in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Double-crown and combined suture-tack mesh fixation: comparative operative characteristics in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.
Mesh overlap achieved during laparoscopic ventral hernia repair and its relationship with defect size: a cross-sectional analytical study.
Adhesiolysis extent and operative time during laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: an analytical cross-sectional study.
Bowel adhesions to previous abdominal scars and operative difficulty during laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a cross-sectional study.
Enterotomy risk during adhesiolysis and preoperative predictors in laparoscopic incisional hernia surgery: an analytical cross-sectional study.
Computed tomography measurements and laparoscopic defect measurements in ventral hernia: a cross-sectional concordance study.
Computed tomography-based hernia morphology and operative strategy in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: an observational cross-sectional study.
Rectus diastasis associated with primary ventral hernia and its impact on operative planning: a cross-sectional study.
Multiple trocar-site and single incisional hernias: differences in defect anatomy during laparoscopic repair in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Trocar-site hernia undergoing laparoscopic repair: clinical and operative characteristics in a descriptive cross-sectional study.
Laparoscopic repair of recurrent incisional hernia after previous mesh placement: operative anatomy and adhesion patterns in a descriptive cross-sectional study.
Mesh-related adhesions encountered during redo laparoscopic ventral hernia surgery: a cross-sectional study.
Operative time and ventral hernia defect complexity during laparoscopic repair: an analytical cross-sectional study.
Clinical and imaging predictors of difficult laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: an analytical cross-sectional study.
Spectrum of laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repairs performed in a tertiary care general surgery department: a descriptive cross-sectional study.
Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection
Laparoscopic colorectal resection for benign and malignant disease: clinical, imaging and operative profile in a descriptive cross-sectional study.
Right-sided and left-sided colonic lesions undergoing laparoscopic resection: differences in patient, tumour and operative characteristics in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for colonic neoplasms: tumour location, vascular anatomy and operative characteristics in a descriptive cross-sectional study.
Laparoscopic left hemicolectomy and sigmoid colectomy: differences in lesion location and technical complexity in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Benign and malignant colorectal lesions undergoing laparoscopic resection: differences in imaging morphology and operative strategy in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Obese and non-obese patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery: differences in mesenteric dissection and operative complexity in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Male and female patients undergoing laparoscopic rectal surgery: differences in pelvic dimensions and operative difficulty in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Computed tomography tumour localisation and laparoscopic intraoperative localisation in colon cancer: a cross-sectional concordance study.
Colonoscopic localisation and intraoperative localisation of colorectal tumours during laparoscopy: a cross-sectional agreement study.
Tumour size and technical difficulty during laparoscopic colorectal resection: an analytical cross-sectional study.
Visceral obesity and operative complexity during laparoscopic colorectal surgery: an analytical cross-sectional study.
Previous abdominal surgery and adhesiolysis burden during laparoscopic colorectal resection: a cross-sectional study.
Right and left colonic vascular anatomy encountered during laparoscopic colectomy: a descriptive anatomical cross-sectional study.
Variations in ileocolic and right colic arterial anatomy during laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a cross-sectional study.
Inferior mesenteric artery branching patterns during laparoscopic left-sided colorectal surgery: a descriptive cross-sectional study.
High and low ligation of mesenteric vessels: differences in tumour location and operative indications in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Intracorporeal and extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: differences in baseline bowel and tumour characteristics in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Stapled and hand-sewn bowel anastomosis during laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery: differences in operative anatomy in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Laparoscopic resection of diverticular and malignant sigmoid disease: differences in inflammatory adhesions and operative complexity in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Laparoscopic surgery for inflammatory bowel disease and colorectal malignancy: differences in mesenteric and bowel characteristics in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Locally advanced and early colorectal tumours: differences in laparoscopic dissection difficulty in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Mesocolic plane quality and tumour location during laparoscopic colon cancer surgery: a cross-sectional operative study.
Total mesorectal excision during laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: operative anatomy and specimen characteristics in a descriptive cross-sectional study.
Low and mid-rectal cancers undergoing laparoscopic resection: differences in pelvic operative complexity in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Tumour distance from the anal verge and choice of laparoscopic rectal procedure: an observational cross-sectional study.
Pelvic dimensions and technical difficulty during laparoscopic rectal surgery: an analytical cross-sectional study.
Conversion to open surgery during laparoscopic colorectal resection and associated preoperative and intraoperative factors: an analytical cross-sectional study.
Operative time and tumour location during laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a cross-sectional analytical study.
Laparoscopic findings in colorectal obstruction selected for minimally invasive surgery: a descriptive cross-sectional study.
Clinical, radiological, endoscopic and operative spectrum of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in a tertiary care general surgery unit: a descriptive cross-sectional study.
Laparoscopic Fundoplication and Hiatal Hernia Repair
Laparoscopic surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease and hiatal hernia: clinical, endoscopic and operative profile in a descriptive cross-sectional study.
Sliding and paraoesophageal hiatal hernias undergoing laparoscopic repair: differences in anatomical and operative characteristics in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Hiatal defect size and operative technique during laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair: an analytical cross-sectional study.
Endoscopic and laparoscopic grading of hiatal hernia: a cross-sectional concordance study.
Endoscopic oesophagitis severity and intraoperative hiatal anatomy in patients undergoing antireflux surgery: an analytical cross-sectional study.
Presence of Barrett oesophagus and hiatal hernia morphology among patients undergoing laparoscopic antireflux surgery: a cross-sectional study.
Obese and non-obese patients undergoing laparoscopic fundoplication: differences in hiatal anatomy and operative characteristics in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Primary and recurrent hiatal hernias: differences in adhesions and operative complexity during laparoscopic repair in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Nissen and partial fundoplication cases: differences in preoperative oesophageal and hiatal characteristics in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Toupet and Nissen fundoplication groups: differences in oesophageal motility and operative selection in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Oesophageal manometry findings and choice of fundoplication technique: an observational cross-sectional study.
Lower oesophageal sphincter pressure and hiatal hernia size in patients selected for laparoscopic antireflux surgery: an analytical cross-sectional study.
Hiatal surface area and requirement for additional crural reinforcement during laparoscopic repair: a cross-sectional study.
Primary suture and mesh-reinforced cruroplasty: differences in baseline hiatal defect characteristics in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Anterior and posterior hiatal cruroplasty: differences in anatomical indications in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Short oesophagus suspected preoperatively and operative assessment during laparoscopic hiatal surgery: a cross-sectional study.
Intrathoracic stomach in paraoesophageal hernia: clinical, imaging and operative profile in a descriptive cross-sectional study.
Gastric volvulus associated with paraoesophageal hernia: imaging and laparoscopic findings in a descriptive cross-sectional study.
Computed tomography and laparoscopic assessment of large paraoesophageal hernia anatomy: a cross-sectional concordance study.
Endoscopic and radiological predictors of large hiatal defect at laparoscopy: an analytical cross-sectional study.
Herniation of stomach alone and stomach with other abdominal viscera through the hiatus: differences in laparoscopic anatomy in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Intraoperative vagal nerve identification during laparoscopic fundoplication: prevalence and anatomical characteristics in a cross-sectional study.
Short gastric vessel division and fundic mobilisation during laparoscopic fundoplication: operative indications in a cross-sectional study.
Complete and partial fundic mobilisation during antireflux surgery: differences in hiatal anatomy in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Operative time and hiatal hernia size during laparoscopic fundoplication: an analytical cross-sectional study.
Previous upper abdominal surgery and technical difficulty during laparoscopic antireflux surgery: a comparative cross-sectional study.
Intraoperative oesophageal or gastric injury during laparoscopic hiatal surgery and associated anatomical factors: a cross-sectional study.
Pleural breach during laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair and associated hernia morphology: an analytical cross-sectional study.
Clinical and imaging predictors of technically difficult laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair: an analytical cross-sectional study.
Spectrum of laparoscopic antireflux and hiatal hernia procedures performed in a tertiary care general surgery unit: a descriptive cross-sectional study.
Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery
Patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery: demographic, metabolic and operative profile in a descriptive cross-sectional study.
Sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass candidates: differences in body mass index, metabolic disease and preoperative gastrointestinal findings in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Body mass index and technical complexity during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: an analytical cross-sectional study.
Visceral obesity and operative difficulty during laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a cross-sectional analytical study.
Liver size and difficulty of gastric exposure during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: an analytical cross-sectional study.
Fatty liver severity and intraoperative liver retraction difficulty in bariatric surgery: a cross-sectional study.
Male and female patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery: differences in fat distribution and operative characteristics in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Diabetic and non-diabetic patients undergoing bariatric surgery: differences in metabolic and operative profiles in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Hypertensive and normotensive patients selected for bariatric surgery: differences in anthropometric and metabolic characteristics in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Obstructive sleep apnoea risk and obesity severity among patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery: an analytical cross-sectional study.
Preoperative upper gastrointestinal endoscopic findings in patients undergoing bariatric surgery: a descriptive cross-sectional study.
Hiatal hernia detected during bariatric surgery and its relationship with preoperative endoscopy: a cross-sectional concordance study.
Gastroesophageal reflux symptoms and intraoperative hiatal hernia in sleeve gastrectomy candidates: an analytical cross-sectional study.
Gastric wall thickness at different levels of the stomach during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: an intraoperative cross-sectional study.
Antral thickness and stapler cartridge selection during sleeve gastrectomy: an analytical cross-sectional study.
Bougie size and intraoperative sleeve dimensions in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a cross-sectional study.
Staple-line reinforcement and non-reinforcement in sleeve gastrectomy: differences in baseline operative characteristics in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Oversewing and buttress reinforcement of the staple line: differences in intraoperative indications during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Staple-line bleeding during sleeve gastrectomy and associated gastric and technical factors: an analytical cross-sectional study.
Gastric torsion or spiral configuration identified intraoperatively after sleeve creation: a cross-sectional study of associated technical factors.
Sleeve gastrectomy in patients with and without hiatal hernia repair: differences in preoperative and intraoperative characteristics in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Primary bariatric surgery and revisional bariatric surgery: differences in adhesions and operative complexity in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Laparoscopic gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy cases: differences in visceral fat and operative anatomy in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Mesenteric thickness and technical complexity during laparoscopic gastric bypass: an analytical cross-sectional study.
Gastrojejunal anastomotic technique and local operative anatomy during laparoscopic gastric bypass: an observational cross-sectional study.
Small-bowel mesenteric anatomy and length measurements during laparoscopic gastric bypass: a descriptive cross-sectional study.
Port placement and body habitus in morbidly obese patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery: an analytical cross-sectional study.
Abdominal wall thickness and trocar length requirements during laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a cross-sectional study.
Pneumoperitoneum pressure and intraoperative ventilation parameters in bariatric surgery: an analytical cross-sectional study confined to the operative period.
Clinical, endoscopic, metabolic and operative spectrum of laparoscopic bariatric surgery in a tertiary care centre: a descriptive cross-sectional study.
Laparoscopic Splenectomy
Laparoscopic splenectomy in adults: clinical, imaging and operative profile in a descriptive cross-sectional study.
Haematological and non-haematological indications for laparoscopic splenectomy: differences in spleen size and operative characteristics in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Normal-sized and enlarged spleens undergoing laparoscopic splenectomy: differences in operative exposure and hilar dissection in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Splenic size on ultrasonography and technical difficulty during laparoscopic splenectomy: an analytical cross-sectional study.
Computed tomography-estimated spleen volume and operative complexity during laparoscopic splenectomy: a cross-sectional correlation study.
Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura and hereditary haemolytic disease undergoing laparoscopic splenectomy: differences in splenic size and operative findings in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Hypersplenism and focal splenic lesions as indications for laparoscopic splenectomy: comparative clinical and imaging characteristics in a cross-sectional study.
Accessory spleens during laparoscopic splenectomy: prevalence, anatomical distribution and imaging correlation in a cross-sectional study.
Preoperative computed tomography and intraoperative detection of accessory spleens: a diagnostic cross-sectional study.
Splenic hilar vascular anatomy encountered during laparoscopic splenectomy: a descriptive cross-sectional study.
Number and branching pattern of splenic hilar vessels and operative difficulty during laparoscopic splenectomy: an analytical cross-sectional study.
Pancreatic tail proximity to the splenic hilum and technical considerations during laparoscopic splenectomy: a cross-sectional anatomical study.
Anterior and lateral approaches to laparoscopic splenectomy: differences in baseline splenic anatomy in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Splenic artery control before hilar division and direct hilar control: differences in spleen size and vascular characteristics in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Individual hilar vessel ligation and stapled hilar division: differences in operative anatomy during laparoscopic splenectomy in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Massive splenomegaly and standard-sized spleens undergoing laparoscopic removal: differences in port placement and specimen extraction strategy in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Specimen retrieval techniques during laparoscopic splenectomy and their relationship with spleen size: an observational cross-sectional study.
Splenic cysts undergoing laparoscopic surgery: clinical, imaging and operative characteristics in a descriptive cross-sectional study.
Parasitic and non-parasitic splenic cysts treated laparoscopically: differences in imaging morphology and operative procedure in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Laparoscopic total and partial splenectomy cases: differences in lesion location and residual splenic anatomy in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Focal splenic lesions and choice of total versus partial laparoscopic splenectomy: an observational cross-sectional study.
Perisplenic adhesions and technical difficulty during laparoscopic splenectomy: an analytical cross-sectional study.
Previous abdominal surgery and operative adhesions during laparoscopic splenectomy: a comparative cross-sectional study.
Obesity and technical complexity during laparoscopic splenectomy: an analytical cross-sectional study.
Intraoperative bleeding during laparoscopic splenectomy and associated splenic hilar anatomy: a cross-sectional study.
Conversion to open surgery during laparoscopic splenectomy and associated anatomical and procedural factors: an analytical cross-sectional study.
Operative time and spleen size during laparoscopic splenectomy: a cross-sectional analytical study.
Preoperative imaging predictors of difficult laparoscopic splenectomy: an analytical cross-sectional study.
Laparoscopic splenectomy with and without concomitant cholecystectomy in haemolytic disorders: differences in baseline clinical and operative characteristics in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Clinical, haematological, radiological and operative spectrum of laparoscopic splenectomy in a tertiary care general surgery department: a descriptive cross-sectional study.
Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy
Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for adrenal masses: clinical, hormonal, imaging and operative profile in a descriptive cross-sectional study.
Functioning and non-functioning adrenal tumours undergoing laparoscopic adrenalectomy: differences in imaging and operative characteristics in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Right and left adrenalectomy: differences in anatomical exposure, vascular control and operative complexity in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Adrenal tumour size and technical difficulty during laparoscopic adrenalectomy: an analytical cross-sectional study.
Small and large adrenal masses undergoing laparoscopic excision: differences in imaging morphology and operative strategy in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Pheochromocytoma and non-pheochromocytoma adrenal masses: differences in intraoperative haemodynamic and anatomical characteristics in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Adrenal adenoma and pheochromocytoma: differences in computed tomography morphology and operative findings in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Adrenal cortical tumour and metastatic adrenal lesion: differences in imaging and laparoscopic characteristics in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Computed tomography attenuation and intraoperative appearance of adrenal masses: a cross-sectional correlation study.
Adrenal mass diameter and periadrenal adhesions during laparoscopic adrenalectomy: an analytical cross-sectional study.
Retroperitoneal fat volume and technical difficulty during laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a cross-sectional analytical study.
Obese and non-obese patients undergoing laparoscopic adrenalectomy: differences in exposure and operative complexity in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Right adrenal vein anatomy during laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a descriptive cross-sectional anatomical study.
Left adrenal vein drainage patterns and operative vascular control during laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a cross-sectional anatomical study.
Accessory adrenal veins and vascular variations encountered during laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a descriptive cross-sectional study.
Transperitoneal and retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy cases: differences in tumour size and anatomical selection in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Previous abdominal surgery and adhesions during transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a comparative cross-sectional study.
Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for incidentaloma and symptomatic adrenal disease: differences in tumour characteristics in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Hormonal activity and tumour size among patients undergoing laparoscopic adrenalectomy: an analytical cross-sectional study.
Preoperative imaging suspicion of malignancy and operative findings during laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a cross-sectional concordance study.
Adrenal tumour relation to kidney, liver, pancreas and major vessels on imaging and at laparoscopy: a cross-sectional anatomical correlation study.
Inferior vena cava proximity and right adrenalectomy difficulty: an analytical cross-sectional study.
Splenic and pancreatic mobilisation requirements during left laparoscopic adrenalectomy: an observational cross-sectional study.
Intraoperative blood pressure variability in pheochromocytoma surgery and tumour characteristics: an analytical cross-sectional study confined to the operative period.
Operative time and adrenal tumour size during laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a cross-sectional analytical study.
Intraoperative bleeding and adrenal vascular anatomy during laparoscopic adrenalectomy: an analytical cross-sectional study.
Conversion to open surgery during laparoscopic adrenalectomy and associated tumour and anatomical factors: a cross-sectional study.
Clinical and computed tomography predictors of difficult laparoscopic adrenalectomy: an analytical cross-sectional study.
Histopathological spectrum of adrenal masses removed laparoscopically and corresponding preoperative imaging characteristics: a cross-sectional correlation study.
Clinical, hormonal, radiological and operative spectrum of laparoscopic adrenalectomy in a tertiary care surgical centre: a descriptive cross-sectional study.
Diagnostic and Therapeutic Laparoscopy for Acute Abdomen and Peritoneal Disease
Diagnostic laparoscopy in patients with undifferentiated acute abdomen: clinical, imaging and intraoperative diagnostic spectrum in a descriptive cross-sectional study.
Preoperative clinical diagnosis and laparoscopic diagnosis in acute abdomen: a cross-sectional concordance study.
Ultrasonography and diagnostic laparoscopy in patients with inconclusive acute abdominal findings: a comparative diagnostic cross-sectional study.
Computed tomography and laparoscopy in patients with suspected hollow-viscus or inflammatory abdominal pathology: a cross-sectional concordance study.
Diagnostic laparoscopy in women with right lower quadrant abdominal pain: spectrum of gastrointestinal and pelvic surgical findings in a descriptive cross-sectional study.
Diagnostic laparoscopy in patients with unexplained recurrent abdominal pain requiring surgical evaluation: intra-abdominal findings in a descriptive cross-sectional study.
Laparoscopic evaluation of abdominal tuberculosis: peritoneal, omental and bowel findings in a descriptive cross-sectional study.
Laparoscopic biopsy in suspected abdominal tuberculosis and peritoneal malignancy: differences in gross morphology and histopathological diagnosis in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Peritoneal tuberculosis and peritoneal carcinomatosis: laparoscopic features useful for differentiation in a diagnostic cross-sectional study.
Ascites of uncertain aetiology undergoing diagnostic laparoscopy: gross peritoneal findings and histopathological spectrum in a cross-sectional study.
Laparoscopic peritoneal biopsy yield in patients with unexplained ascites and inconclusive imaging: a diagnostic cross-sectional study.
Peritoneal nodules and omental thickening on computed tomography and their laparoscopic correlation: a cross-sectional study.
Laparoscopic assessment of suspected intra-abdominal malignancy for resectability: imaging and operative findings in a cross-sectional study.
Radiological and laparoscopic assessment of peritoneal metastatic disease burden: a cross-sectional concordance study.
Diagnostic laparoscopy in gastric and pancreatic malignancy with equivocal metastatic disease: prevalence of occult peritoneal deposits in a cross-sectional study.
Laparoscopy in blunt abdominal trauma with equivocal imaging findings: injury spectrum and therapeutic procedures in a descriptive cross-sectional study.
Diaphragmatic injuries detected by laparoscopy after thoracoabdominal trauma: clinical and imaging characteristics in a cross-sectional study.
Laparoscopic management of perforated peptic ulcer: clinical, perforation-related and operative characteristics in a descriptive cross-sectional study.
Small and large perforated peptic ulcers treated laparoscopically: differences in contamination and operative repair characteristics in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Perforation size and operative time during laparoscopic closure of perforated peptic ulcer: an analytical cross-sectional study.
Laparoscopic adhesiolysis for acute adhesive intestinal obstruction: clinical, imaging and operative profile in a descriptive cross-sectional study.
Single-band and dense-multiple-adhesion intestinal obstruction: differences in laparoscopic operative complexity in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Computed tomography predictors of successful laparoscopic access in adhesive small-bowel obstruction: an analytical cross-sectional study.
Laparoscopic findings in patients with intestinal obstruction and no previous abdominal surgery: a descriptive cross-sectional study.
Internal hernia and adhesive obstruction identified during laparoscopy: differences in imaging and intraoperative characteristics in a comparative cross-sectional study.
Laparoscopic drainage of intra-abdominal abscesses: anatomical distribution, imaging findings and procedural characteristics in a descriptive cross-sectional study.
Laparoscopic management of liver abscess requiring surgical drainage: clinical, imaging and operative characteristics in a cross-sectional study.
Diagnostic laparoscopy converted to therapeutic laparoscopy in acute abdominal conditions: spectrum of diagnoses and procedures in a descriptive cross-sectional study.
Clinical and imaging predictors of therapeutic findings during diagnostic laparoscopy for acute abdomen: an analytical cross-sectional study.
Spectrum of diagnostic and therapeutic laparoscopic procedures performed for acute abdominal and peritoneal surgical pathologies in a tertiary care general surgery department in India: a hospital-based descriptive cross-sectional study.
Not the general surgery subspeciality you need? Laparoscopic surgeries is one section of our full general surgery collection — the hub page lists every subspeciality, each with its own free topic list. Updated October 2026.
Updated for 2026–2027 postgraduate surgery research
Prioritise procedures regularly performed in the parent unit, and ensure that intraoperative findings and routine preoperative variables are recorded consistently.
Use existing clinical examination findings, ultrasound or CT reports, laboratory results, operative notes and postoperative records; add pathology or endoscopy reports only when clinically obtained.
Define operative difficulty, conversion, critical view of safety, defect dimensions, anatomical variants and immediate complications in advance; no extra scan, invasive investigation or research-only procedure is needed.
Make the dissertation publishable by selecting one procedure-specific primary question, documenting consecutive recruitment, ensuring reproducible measurements and acknowledging case selection and surgeon-experience effects.
Generate a protocol from any topic above
Select Generate Protocol → beside any title in the list above and receive a submission-ready document built around that topic, containing all eighteen components:
Introduction / Synopsis
Research Question
Aim of the Study
Primary Objective
Secondary Objectives
Materials and Methods
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
Sample Size Calculation
Methodology
Statistical Analysis
Ethical Considerations
Review of Literature
References
Gantt Chart / Study Timeline
Patient Information Sheet
Consent Form
Data Collection Form
Already have your thesis title?
Generate the full laparoscopic surgeries protocol directly — objectives, methodology, sample size, statistics, timeline, references and annexures.
Alongside laparoscopic surgeries protocols and synopses, support is also available for departmental presentations, journal club presentations, ethics committee presentations, and posters and oral presentations for medical conferences — for postgraduate residents, board trainees and research scholars across India and the GCC. Prepared by a practising doctor with long experience in medical publishing and thesis supervision.
The topics above work as research questions anywhere — what changes is the document the institution expects, and who approves it before data collection begins. The Gulf equivalent of an Indian synopsis is the laparoscopic surgeries research proposal submitted to an institutional review board, and it ordinarily carries three sections an Indian synopsis does not: a Gantt chart, a budget and resources section, and a Declaration of Helsinki statement.
Board and residency programmes — country by country
Saudi Arabia — SCFHS and the Saudi Board. Residency and fellowship training under the Saudi Commission for Health Specialties includes a research project with a set timeline, and the laparoscopic surgeries research proposal is the document prepared at the outset and cleared by the institutional review board before recruitment starts.
United Arab Emirates — DHA, DOH Abu Dhabi and MOHAP. Residents training in Dubai, Abu Dhabi and the northern emirates prepare a laparoscopic surgeries research protocol for their programme and submit it for institutional review board approval before any data are collected.
Qatar — DHP (formerly QCHP) and Hamad Medical Corporation. A laparoscopic surgeries IRB proposal is reviewed before recruitment, with the ethics section written to the institution's own template rather than a generic one.
Bahrain — NHRA. Trainees turning laparoscopic surgeries research topics into a project need the proposal cleared by their institutional research and ethics committee before fieldwork begins.
Oman — OMSB. Residency programmes under the Oman Medical Specialty Board include a research component, and the laparoscopic surgeries research proposal is the document assessed at the start of it.
Kuwait — KIMS. A laparoscopic surgeries study protocol goes to the institutional committee for approval before the project begins.
Arab Board programmes across the region. The Arab Board carries its own research requirement irrespective of the host country, and the laparoscopic surgeries proposal follows the same structure throughout.
Postgraduate degrees — Malaysia, the Gulf and beyond
Malaysia — MMed, the National Medical Research Register and MREC. A laparoscopic surgeries dissertation proposal for a Master of Medicine programme carried out in a Ministry of Health facility must be registered on the NMRR and approved by the Medical Research and Ethics Committee before the study begins, and the guidance asks for submission four to six months ahead of data collection. Every investigator on the study team registers on the NMRR as well, so the methodology, ethics and team sections are written in far more detail than an Indian synopsis requires.
PhD and Master's candidates elsewhere. University programmes generally require a full laparoscopic surgeries research proposal of roughly 6,000 to 10,000 words, with an extended literature review, a theoretical framework and a detailed methodology chapter.
PhD and MMed proposals are written individually by a medical doctor and revised until the supervisor accepts them. They are not produced by the automated protocol generator.
Trending laparoscopic surgery research areas for 2026–2027
Projects based on measurable anatomy and operating-room records are particularly practical for surgical residents and can identify local gaps in perioperative documentation.
Predicting difficult cholecystectomy and appendectomy using preoperative clinical or imaging parameters and predefined operative criteria, while recording bailout techniques and conversion separately.
Comparing preperitoneal and ventral hernia anatomy, mesh overlap, fixation and adhesiolysis burden without implying that non-randomised technique selection demonstrates superiority.
Assessing laparoscopic colorectal and hiatal surgery through tumour location, mesorectal or mesocolic dissection, pelvic anatomy, hiatal dimensions and relevant imaging-to-operation agreement.
Examining bariatric, splenic, adrenal and acute-abdomen laparoscopy through organ-specific anatomical complexity, preoperative risk, access strategy, perioperative blood loss and immediate findings.
Protocol and synopsis guidance
How should I design a practical laparoscopic surgery observational study?
Select one common operation and enrol consecutive eligible patients over a defined period. Record the unit of analysis as patient or operation, baseline disease severity, surgeon experience, operative indications and relevant imaging. Specify the index procedure, primary outcome and time point before data collection. For difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy, use a prespecified intraoperative difficulty scale; document critical view of safety, subtotal cholecystectomy, fundus-first dissection and conversion as distinct observations. In laparoscopic appendectomy, keep uncomplicated, gangrenous and perforated pathology categories explicit. Ensure technique comparisons remain descriptive unless the design addresses allocation bias.
What is the difference between a thesis synopsis and a protocol for laparoscopy research?
The synopsis briefly states the rationale, research question, objectives, design, setting, eligibility, outcome definitions, sample-size rationale and analysis plan for departmental approval. The complete protocol specifies case identification, imaging and operative variables, exact measurement methods, data capture forms, missing-data handling, adverse-event definitions, quality assurance and ethical safeguards. It should distinguish clinical indication from procedure type and explicitly document how conversions, combined operations and repeat interventions are counted.
How can I calculate sample size and plan statistics for laparoscopic surgery topics?
Base sample size on the primary endpoint: a prevalence estimate needs expected proportion and precision, a correlation needs anticipated correlation, and a group comparison needs a clinically relevant difference and variability. Compare continuous variables with suitable parametric or non-parametric methods; categorical variables with chi-square or exact methods. Evaluate imaging-versus-operative agreement using kappa for categorical measures or Bland–Altman analysis for continuous dimensions, rather than correlation alone. Adjust key associations for case severity, previous surgery, obesity and operator experience when sample size allows. Rare events such as conversion, bile duct injury or major bleeding may not support reliable multivariable prediction in a single-centre dissertation.
1. Which laparoscopic surgery thesis topics are feasible for the 2026–2027 academic year?
High-volume topics involving laparoscopic cholecystectomy, appendectomy and inguinal hernia repair are usually the most feasible in units with standard operation notes. Predictors of difficulty, preoperative imaging correlation and clearly defined intraoperative findings often require no additional investigations. Advanced colorectal, bariatric, adrenal or splenic topics require sufficient local case volume.
2. Which study design should I choose for a laparoscopic surgery dissertation?
A descriptive cross-sectional design suits anatomical or procedural profiles; an analytical cross-sectional design suits associations measured at the index operation; and a prospective observational cohort is needed when genuinely assessing subsequent postoperative outcomes. A retrospective design is appropriate if clinical and operative records are sufficiently complete. Choose the design based on the endpoint rather than describing every comparison as an outcomes trial.
3. Should my surgical guide approve the final topic before I start collecting data?
Yes. Confirm the exact procedure, objectives, expected number of eligible operations, availability of imaging and operative documentation, and whether the unit routinely performs the proposed procedure. Obtain institutional and departmental approval as required before recruitment or access to identifiable records.
4. Can I complete a laparoscopic surgery thesis using existing hospital records?
Yes, if operation notes reliably record anatomy, operative difficulty, time, conversion and relevant interventions, while imaging and baseline clinical data can be linked to the same patient. Do not retrospectively invent missing severity scores or claim outcomes that were not followed. Restrict comparisons to routinely acquired investigations and clearly identify missing data.
5. How does a thesis synopsis differ from a full research protocol?
The synopsis is a concise approval document describing why and how the question will be studied. The full protocol contains operational definitions, precise inclusion and exclusion rules, data collection procedures, endpoint timing, sample-size assumptions, statistical methods, quality checks and an ethics plan. Both must use consistent objectives and study terminology.
6. What ethical precautions are important in laparoscopic surgical research?
Obtain Institutional Ethics Committee approval or a valid exemption or retrospective consent waiver where permitted, and informed consent for prospective enrolment. Routine surgical decisions must not be altered solely for the thesis. Protect patient identity, de-identify images and theatre records, avoid unnecessary contrast imaging or radiation, and report intraoperative adverse events honestly. For children or adolescents, obtain guardian permission and assent where applicable. Emergency cases need an approved consent pathway.
7. How should difficult laparoscopy, conversion and operative success be measured?
Define difficulty with a procedure-specific and reproducible grading system or explicit operative components such as adhesions, exposure, dissection difficulty, bleeding and time. Conversion to open surgery is a distinct intraoperative outcome and may reflect sound judgement rather than failure. For cholecystectomy, record achievement of critical view of safety and bailout strategies; for hernia procedures, record defect and mesh characteristics; and for oncology, avoid treating an immediate technical result as long-term cancer control.
8. Are these laparoscopic surgery topics appropriate for PhD or international medical boards?
These topics can provide a starting point for Indian MS or DNB dissertations, but a PhD usually requires a more substantial and original research programme. International pathways such as SCFHS or Saudi Board, Arab Board, DHP, DHA, DOH and MOHAP have distinct training, research and assessment requirements. No topic list guarantees acceptance or equivalence; verify current local programme rules and supervisor approval.
9. How should I register and document a laparoscopic surgery thesis study?
Finalise the protocol with the guide, obtain ethics and institutional permissions, and register prospectively when required by the study design or institution. Use a dated screening log, anonymous study IDs, a predefined case report form and an audit trail for changes. Report the study design accurately and follow relevant STROBE guidance for observational analyses.
Found a topic that fits your department?
Generate its full protocol — objectives, methodology, sample size, statistics, timeline, references and annexures — in editable format.
